The subject disputed by the writer and the lecturer is about the identity of an individual from a painting. The former thinks that the person is Jane Austen, during her teen years. The latter claims doubt on the evidence presented by the author.
First, when the painting was made publicly, Austen had already been dead for seventeen years, so most probably her living relatives did not even know how she used to look like. Therefore, it would have been impossible for family to sustain the authenticity of the portrait. This is a strong counter-point to the author's point of view.
Second, the Austen's was a numerous family, with many female members who were the same or around Jane's age, when the portrait was made. Thus, there is a major possibility that the illustrated person could be one of the Austen's closed relatives. Moreover, Jane Austen had a niece whose face features resembled to Jane. Even though the passage sustains that the painting has the same physical traits like the sketch made by Cassandra, the this last argument demonstrates the existence of other multiple explanations for the resemblance.
Third, the black canvas used for the painting wasn't being sold in London when Jane was a teenager, but when she was in her middle twenties. In other words, it is impossible that Oziaz Humphrey could have painted Jane while she was a teenager. Thus, this argument's validity is questionable. In conclusion, the author and the lecturer appear to be in disagreement regarding this topic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: THE_NN_AND_THE_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'are'?
Suggestion: are
...disputed by the writer and the lecturer is about the identity of an individual fro...
^^
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... is Jane Austen, during her teen years. The latter claims doubt on the evidence pre...
^^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...aits like the sketch made by Cassandra, the this last argument demonstrates the existenc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 47, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... the black canvas used for the painting wasnt being sold in London when Jane was a te...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
...e while she was a teenager. Thus, this arguments validity is questionable. In conclusion...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, moreover, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, third, thus, while, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99603174603 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64599830013 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615079365079 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4775679173 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9285714286 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420761534119 0.272083759551 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122453279756 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926921707996 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235849799316 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812935715736 0.0443174109184 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.