Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

Essay topics:

Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

Once with the development of various industries, the environment has suffered from a massive degradation, all over the world. Some parts of the ecosystem such as forests, animals and clean waters, are threatened with annihilation. If I had the chance to save one of the aforementioned elements, I would definitely choose the forests, due to the fact that by protecting the forests, more parts of the living and non-living can be saved. I will explain my choice in detail, in the following essay.

First, forests themselves represent the life and the revival of living organisms. Forests provide oxygen, which is a vital gas for all the livings of the Earth. In addition, the trees control the climate of an area, provide food and shelter, all these being fundamental aspects for the survival of many species. Therefore saving the wooded areas means the same time, saving the animals. It is scientifically proved that the heavy deforestation conducts to the disappearance of many living creatures. Moreover, some of them can become dangerous for the people's live. For instance, the news about bears and wolves that leave the forests in order to find food has continually increased lately. These animals cannot find enough food in the woods anymore, so they are attracted by the garbage containers that might contain food waste. People must intervene for tragedies not to happen, and planting more trees would totally be a successful solution.

Second, by rescuing the forests, numerous other natural resources are being protected. If lawmaker elaborate anti-polluting bills, plenty of plants, rivers, lakes, would directly benefit. The woodland is the house of both the animals and the plants so all elements of the nature are strongly interconnected. In other words, the forest is multi-functional, covering all the parts of the ecosystem. For instance, I have recently read an article about how the complex process of pollinating. Both the animals and the insects, spread the seeds of the plants or trees on wide areas, contributing to the maintaining of the natural chain. Hence, all we have to do is not to cut down the trees, and the nature will follow it's innate course.

To summarize, forests are the most essential natural resources that must benefit from protection. This is because saving the woods means saving both the rest of living and non-living organism.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...pects for the survival of many species. Therefore saving the wooded areas means the same ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, as for, for instance, in addition, such as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14728682171 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85197580629 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552971576227 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8942273074 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5454545455 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5909090909 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161102347389 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443093013186 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047716025734 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102205977498 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487865908449 0.0645574589148 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.