This article states that Jane Austen who is a famous novelist, her full portrait was made by the professional painting and her family says that this is her picture when she was a teenage girl and passage provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that he was not convinced by the portrait of Jane Austen as a teenager which was made by professionals and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading claims that Austen's family gave permission to portrait her painting and recognized that the girl in the painting is Austen. The professor refutes this point by saying that the family gave permission in the year 1882. But Austen died before 70 years where her family members have never seen her.
Secondly, the article posits that Cassandra's drawing clearly resembles the face of Austen in the portrait. However, the professor says that Austen's family is large and don't know who painted her face. According to the professor, the picture in the painting may be Austen's niece.
Thirdly, the reading says that even though there is no sign or date on the painting there is a proof that it was done by Ozias Humphrey when Austin was a teenager. The professor opposes this point by explaining that the Humphrey started selling the portraits when the girl was at the age 27. He states that Humphrey is older than the girl who is in the painting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...r says that Austens family is large and dont know who painted her face. According to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79166666667 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41176226486 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 338.4 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1689706874 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.545454545 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513605783655 0.272083759551 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.213785887696 0.0996497079465 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116094564901 0.0662205650399 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327611419416 0.162205337803 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882266984473 0.0443174109184 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.