Both the article and lecture discuss Austen’s picture in different perspectives. The lecture seems to negate all the ideas that the author of the reading has mentioned in the article.
First of all, the author of the reading points out that in 1882 Austen's family gave a permission to use her portrait to indicate her letters. This point is challenged by the lecture. He rebuts that Austen’s family asserted her painting after she died 70 years, therefore, they might not see her by themselves. As a result, they may not know exactly whether its subject is hers or not.
Secondly, the reading contends that the face in the portrait resembles with Austen's face, such as nose, mouth eyebrows and overall shape. The lecture refutes this argument that Austen’s family was extremely large, so, there were many her relative teenagers who are identical to her. Moreover, many experts also assure that idea is true.
Finally, the author of the reading states that the style of that painting linked to the style of Ozias Humphrey, who Austen’s family would hire and the painting was actually depicted when Austen was a teenager. The lecture on the other hand, opposes this point that the stamp indicated behind the portrait’s canvas has a name of a seller called Williams, who didn’t sell canvas in London during Humphrey’s painting activity, rather than he sold his paintings when Austen was twenty –seven years old.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... large, so, there were many her relative teenagers who are identical to her. More...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1223628692 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72133254194 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607594936709 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.8598791069 49.2860985944 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.363636364 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9090909091 7.06452816374 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378042187498 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143926477779 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115045783615 0.0662205650399 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227400498984 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805442302569 0.0443174109184 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.