The Reading and the lecture are both about a new full-length portrait which has come out and it is believed that is the English novelist Jane Austen –a non already recognized woman- who has been sketched by her sister. The author thinks that there are some good reasons to call the painting as Jane Austen because of its resemblances. The professor brings into question the claims made in the article. He considers that calling the painting Jane A. is questionable because the links are not much convincing.
First, the author explains that the family Austen after Jane’s death gave the acceptance to portray their died daughter. It is mentioned that the Austen family strongly thought that Jane is the girl in the painting. However, the professor argues that as Jane had been died for 70 years how the someone would paint Jane.
Second, the author states that Jane’s face resembles so much the one in the painting, moreover, the painting has many important details which were of the young Jane. Meanwhile, the professor rebuts this argument. He highlights that the person in the painting could be Jane’s relative and therefore, he would have the same features as jane or the closest ones.
Finally, the author contends that some have recognized teenager Jane painted in Ozias’ paintings because he was hired by the family Austen he could have portrayed Jane as well. The professor, on the other hand, posits that the black Canvas made by Ozias was not sold in London where Jane lived and at that time Jane was 74 much older than the portrayed woman.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ane Austen because of its resemblances. The professor brings into question the clai...
^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'someone'?
Suggestion: the; someone
... as Jane had been died for 70 years how the someone would paint Jane. Second, the autho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Jane lived and at that time Jane was 74 much older than the portrayed woman.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95488721805 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47806819514 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563909774436 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3851495701 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.384615385 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368122369324 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135500151295 0.0996497079465 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963081322645 0.0662205650399 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235695709221 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062646041862 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.