The author describes that commercial fossils trade is an unfortunate development for both scientists and the general public and provides three reasons to support this claim. On the other hand, the professor asserts that negative consequences of selling and buying fossils are exaggerated and she says that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages; in addition, she refutes each of the author's reasons with rational grounds.
First, the writer states that commercial fossils trade makes it harder for the public to see fossils which lead to the reduction of public interest in fossils. Nevertheless, the speaker points out that selling and buying fossils provide greater exposure for the public to visit them not less opportunity. What’s more, a lot of fossils are available for purchase and even low-level public, such as schools and museums, definitely can buy and display them for the public.
Second, according to the reading, scientists lose access to some of the most important fossils and presumably miss crucial discoveries. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that it is not a realistic viewpoint. In fact, all fossils should scientifically identify before selling which means that detail examination should be conducted on fossils, even if private collectors want to but them. To be more specific, all the fossils pass through hands of scientific experts and nothing will be missed in this way.
Third, the author expressed that as most fossil collectors are inexpert people, they destroy valuable scientific evidence. However, the professor posits that if commercial fossil collectors pay no attention to fossils, simply lots of them would be undiscovered yet. Admittedly, universities and scientific institutes are not equipped enough; therefore, it is better to find more fossils, although many scientific data cannot be discovered.
Therefore, the points mentioned in the reading do not make any sense.
- Some people believe that parents should pay their children a small amount of money to do jobs around the home (such as washing the dishes or taking out the garbage), while other people believe that parents should not pay their children to do these tasks. 73
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people 70
- Which one is the most important factor to help you work productively?- Having an environment which is free of noise and distractions- Knowing that you will receive a reward- Doing something you are interested in 90
- The government wants to fund one of the following areas to improve children's education. Which one do you think is better? Why?- hire more teachers to teach in a small class- make preschool education before kindergarten mandatory- provide some training co 83
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX
Message: Use simply 'public'.
...development for both scientists and the general public and provides three reasons to support t...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, in addition, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48993288591 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.886030901 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593959731544 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5107526401 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.846153846 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.533896013082 0.272083759551 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182619809397 0.0996497079465 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107974357214 0.0662205650399 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247773413902 0.162205337803 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130231182733 0.0443174109184 294% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.