The article states that the rare and important fossils are now being sold to private ownership which is an unfortunate development for both scientists and the general public and provides three reasons of support. However the professor refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading claims that the public suffers because fossils that would otherwise be donated to museums where everyone can see them are sold to private collectors who do not allow the public to view their collections. The professor refutes this point by saying that the great result is less exposure. She states that low level public school routinely buys fossils for public to view.
Second, the article posits that scientists are likely to lose access to some of the most important fossils and thereby miss out on potentially crucial discoveries about extinct life forms. However, the professor says that they do not realize either. According to the professor people put value when scientists performed detailed tests and it can only pass through scientist .So scientist community will not miss the important discoveries.
Third, the reading says that the commercial fossil collectors often destroy valuable scientific evidence associated with the fossils they unearth. The professor opposes this point by explaining that they are not run by university/school. According to the professor it is better for science to find many fossils.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...development for both scientists and the general public and provides three reasons of support. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... and provides three reasons of support. However the professor refutes each of the autho...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s and it can only pass through scientist .So scientist community will not miss the...
^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...and it can only pass through scientist .So scientist community will not miss the i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39461883408 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7327120257 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600896860987 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9298472097 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.363636364 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 7.06452816374 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.502891896237 0.272083759551 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168582146481 0.0996497079465 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148517873235 0.0662205650399 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292137050697 0.162205337803 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049698704828 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.