TPO 14 integrated essay
The article declares that salvage logging is the practice to remove dead trees after the fire and severe storms in the forest it is a very helpful method and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that salvage logging will create a long-run environmental problem and refutes each of the author's reasons.
To begin with, the passage states that this method helps to clear dead trees and make space for new growth which helps to recover from the disaster. On the other hand, the lecturer contradicts these points by stating that decompose is not necessary. She explains that dead trees provide soils and nutrition which helps in the future for other trees to grow.
Moreover, the reading claims that salvage logging helps to remove insect-like spruce bark beetle which damages the health of the forest. Nonetheless, the speaker says that the insect population will increase but they are not much harmful. She mentions that spruce bark beetle leaves for 100 years but we did not see any major damage. She also says that dead trees are not habitat for insect only but other species like birds also leaves which is useful for the forest, if we remove dead trees than we damage more to the forest.
Lastly, the reading contends that salvage logging has economic benefits. The speaker cast doubt on this theory she says that advantage is small and it is not long-lasting. She explains that Helicopter and other big vehicles are needed to remove dead trees which is more expensive. She also says that jobs are created but it is temporary and for that, we have to hire people who are more train than the residents.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, moreover, nonetheless, so, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89285714286 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25655507718 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5324670269 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.384615385 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.463260637611 0.272083759551 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162127112766 0.0996497079465 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117701505183 0.0662205650399 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28322463088 0.162205337803 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717808886102 0.0443174109184 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.