TPO 14 Integrated
Both the lecture and the passage are discussing whether salvage logging, a method by which old dead trees are removed from forest areas, is beneficial or not both ecologically and economically. The assignment suggests that this method provide multidimensional advantages. However, the professor casts doubt on this claim and provide three main reasons vindicating her viewpoints.
First of all, the passage claims that dead trees will not be removed even during a long temporal period. If we don't remove these dead trees after a devastating fire, there would be no room for new trees to grow in the cramped spaces. On the other hand, the lecturer challenges this specific argument reasoning that these dead trees will provide the soil in the future and if we clean them up there will be no source of soil in the future.
Secondly, the writer suggests that the new generation of insects which locate in such dead trees can affect harmfully the surrounding environment. The professor, on the other hand, oppose this argument according to the fact that these insects will provide no harm and the trees can live with insects population lasting for hundreds of years. The lecturer mentions other harmful insects and birds which are potentially harmful if we apply the salvage logging program.
Finally, the economical aspect of salvage logging is important for the author. In terms of economic benefits, this program is accounted beneficial for the writer. However, the professor collides with this point of view, because of the small and indurable effect of program on the economy. She asserts that the program itself needs a large amount of money and will provide only limited temporary job positions. The wood, however, is useless from the lecturer's viewpoint.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...en during a long temporal period. If we dont remove these dead trees after a devasta...
^^^^
Line 13, column 450, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
... The wood, however, is useless from the lecturers viewpoint.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19163763066 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62789387553 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3165791062 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.428571429 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36424230584 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118512216515 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068916843859 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203330003747 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262785298417 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.