Integrated TPO 16
The lecture and the passage are both about the archeological studies and their situation in the United kigdom which seems to have a graet historic background. The writer feels that there are remarkable limitations restricting the arceological studies. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this claim and provides three main reason vindicating her viewpoints.
First of all, the author of the assignment is of the opinion that many noticable artifacts had been being lost owing to constructions and their hazards for archeologcal sites. The lecturer,on the other hand, mentions a new legislation and guidline which improves this situations by imposing the constructors to . according to this guidline the constructors have to examine and preserve the site for archeological studies.
Secondly, the article writer claims that inadequate financial support provided for archeological studies would be assumed as aan important limitation. Again the lecturer refers to the new guidline whic indicates the costs of new studies in new sites of constructions shoould be paied by the constructors. This new legislations means a raise in financial supports for archeological studies.
Last but not least, the writer feels that archeology careers are limited to specific acaademic areas with limited positions; which means many possible archeological investigations might have left without any professional archeologist. The lecturer states her opposition with new possible works which provides by the recent guidline. According to this guidline many archeological studies should be funded by the constructors. She also notices the statistic datas which supports her position. the data shows an increase in number of accupations whithin the realm of archeology in the UK.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , on
...rds for archeologcal sites. The lecturer,on the other hand, mentions a new legislat...
^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tuations by imposing the constructors to . according to this guidline the construc...
^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...tions by imposing the constructors to . according to this guidline the constructors have ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 328, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'mean'.
Suggestion: mean
...the constructors. This new legislations means a raise in financial supports for arche...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 492, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...stic datas which supports her position. the data shows an increase in number of acc...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 264.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7196969697 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15496523353 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57196969697 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8483588225 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.857142857 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 10.9000537634 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.