The lecture and the reading both discuss forest. While the reading states that forest fires and other disasters can cause lots of damage and a way can alleviate this problem called salvage logging which helps to remove dead trees from the forest. The lecture refutes this, saying that salvage logging appear to positive effect and recovering forest but actually it seriously long determined damage.
First of all, the reading claims that if the dead trees do not remove of the forest it makes a difficult condition for growing new trees and salvage logging definitely helps forest after the catastrophe to become fresh and brisk environment. However, the lecture argues that cleaning up forest after disasters does not necessary and also the decomposing of trees has an advantage for tree and nutrient for growing.
In addition, the reading makes the argument that dead trees in the forest makes the harmful situation for trees by a dangerous insect for example, as reading mentioned, the beetle can damage spruce trees and the salvage logging makes it decline. The lecture counters this point by stating it is true that rotting wood can increase insect population but is it bad for the forest? According to the lecture, spruce can live 100 years without causing damage. The lecture said that salvage logging more harmful that insect.
Lastly, the reading passages argue that the salvage logging has economic advantages such as many industrials try to use forest products or salvage can create jobs for local people. According to the reading a fire forest completely harmful for economic. The lecture refutes this claims by pointing out that the salvage has benefits for economic but are small and salvage recover forest by using Helicopter and other vehicles. Additionally, creating jobs by salvages are temporary
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'lastly', 'so', 'while', 'for example', 'in addition', 'such as', 'first of all', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25 0.261695866417 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.183544303797 0.158904122519 116% => OK
Adjectives: 0.110759493671 0.0723426182421 153% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0411392405063 0.0435111971325 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0158227848101 0.0277247811725 57% => OK
Prepositions: 0.117088607595 0.128828473217 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0632911392405 0.0370669169778 171% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.42026776708 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0189873417722 0.0208969081088 91% => OK
Particles: 0.00632911392405 0.00154638098197 409% => OK
Determiners: 0.113924050633 0.128158765124 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0189873417722 0.0158828679856 120% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00632911392405 0.0114777025283 55% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1814.0 1645.83664459 110% => OK
No of words: 295.0 271.125827815 109% => OK
Chars per words: 6.14915254237 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.427118644068 0.374372842146 114% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.332203389831 0.287516216867 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.166101694915 0.187439937562 89% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0983050847458 0.113142543107 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42026776708 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501694915254 0.539623497131 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.6773586752 53.8517498576 92% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.6923076923 21.7502111507 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4588632046 49.3711431718 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.538461538 132.220823453 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 21.7502111507 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.07692307692 0.878197800319 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 55.9126466754 50.5018328374 111% => OK
Elegance: 1.78947368421 1.90840788429 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.699420053622 0.549887131256 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.167833979123 0.142949733639 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.061646524908 0.0787303798458 78% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.628712355536 0.631733273073 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.175167265787 0.139662658121 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.329503283082 0.266732575781 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133520729848 0.103435571967 129% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.455113654711 0.414875509568 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0170056287484 0.0530846634433 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.524690102546 0.40443939384 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477486050616 0.0528353158467 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.62251655629 193% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.