The article states that a large cane toad causes the damage to the environment. The reading provides three different ways that could prevent spreading of the large cane toad. However, the professor explains that is not easy as reading suggests. He states that this will be unsuccessful and will create huge environmental damage.
First, the reading states that national fence will stop the spreading of a toad. The professor refutes this point by stating that the fence won't stop the migration of toad. He explains that somewhere near the fence would be a river or a stream, which could carry young toads and eggs to another side. Even a few young toads are enough to establish a population. That's why professor think that this is an ineffective solution.
Second, the article claims that toads could be captured and destroyed by volunteers. However, the professor contends that this idea could have succeed but it is more likely to fail. The professor explains that people more likely to be untrained. As a result, they could destroy a native species of frog, because it is hard to distinguish different kinds of frog especially when they are young.
Third, the reading avers that researchers could make a virus which would prevent them from maturing and reproducing. The lecture opposes this point by saying that this is a bad idea. The professor states that it could cause serious consequences for their original habitat in America. He explains that infected Australian frog could be transported by researchers or pet collector and when it reaches the destination it could cause serious devastation of the ecosystem in America because this species plays a vital role in their native habitat. As a result, the ecosystem will suffer
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...s are enough to establish a population. Thats why professor think that this is an ine...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'succeeded'.
Suggestion: succeeded
...ssor contends that this idea could have succeed but it is more likely to fail. The prof...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05902777778 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63850280436 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496527777778 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9186648479 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.9444444444 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05555555556 7.06452816374 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359420822875 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119179648273 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884003443115 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224676449211 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687683162934 0.0443174109184 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.