The cane toad is an animal that transported from South America to Australia to protect framers' crop by eating harmful insects. But suddenly the large population of this animal became the problem for australian. The reading passage propose three methods to stop spreading of the cane toad. But the lecturer thinks that proposed method are not easy and also will cause enviromental damages.
The reading passage proposes national fences to prevent this animals from spreading in different places. But the lecturer thinks that cane toad uses water to spread their eggs and by using water, they can cross these fences easily.
The reading passage proposes a campaign to destroy this animals using volunteers. Because cane toads are easy to gather and destroy. But the lecturer thinks that this method will destroy many native frogs which live in Australia. Because volunteere cannot distinguise this native frogs and cane toad easily.
Finally, the reading passage proposes the method that uses virus to prevent maturing and reproduction in cane toad. But the lecturer thinks that using virus is terrible idea that will have harmful effects on America. Because by exchanging reptiles between two countries, virus will spread in America and also threat the native cane toad which lives in America.
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 3
- TOEFL T P O 21 Integrated Writing Task 81
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 3
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 60
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also will cause enviromental damages. The reading passage proposes national fe...
^^
Line 2, column 59, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...age proposes national fences to prevent this animals from spreading in different pla...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r, they can cross these fences easily. The reading passage proposes a campaign ...
^^
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... passage proposes a campaign to destroy this animals using volunteers. Because cane ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his native frogs and cane toad easily. Finally, the reading passage proposes th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 207.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26086956522 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33319830377 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507246376812 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.2206328005 49.2860985944 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.7692307692 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9230769231 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 7.06452816374 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457326851471 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185508787937 0.0996497079465 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807852325148 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313077523031 0.162205337803 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304035614051 0.0443174109184 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.