The reading passage makes three suggestions to cease to spread of the cane toad in Australia which is one of the harmful insects including to build the national fence, collect volunteers to destroy cane toad and develop a disease or virus. However, the lecturer cast doubts each idea of the author.
First and foremost, the article suggests that the national fence will block the move of toads to the parts that are toadless areas of Australia. On the other hand, the professor rejected that point by saying that the young toads live in marine, so, even though where the fence is, they could not block the cane to spread. According to him, it is not an effective way.
Secondly, the passage indicates that volunteers could destroy the young canes because they live in water and also easy to catch. Also, the government can organize the campaign to collect them. In contrast, the lecturer argued that untrained people could hunt the national frog instead of canes. He also argued that people may damage the economic system by declining the native frog population.
Finally, the reading claims that people can control the population of cane toad by developing a virus or diseases between the cane toads. Nonetheless, the lecturer made a counterclaim to the idea by explaining that the virus can spread to America by toads which may harmful for the native American cane toads. He also concluded that it may have terrible consequences for the population of canes all over the world.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92828685259 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44657199209 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529880478088 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6951270291 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.083333333 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404355862729 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134611765825 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117363173715 0.0662205650399 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244705757503 0.162205337803 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08980821448 0.0443174109184 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.