TPO 16 -
In the reading passage, the author claims that the field of archaeology encounters sever obstacles and restrictions in Britain, which contains a wide array of precious traces of human settlements living in the past, by pointing out 3 reasons of support. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and refers to the rule established in 1990 in the United Kingdom that altered all the difficulties mentioned in reading and did enhance substantial improvement in all those three areas.
At first, the author argues that worthy artifacts are being destroyed due to construction projects. Conversely, the professor demonstrates that based on the 1990's regulation, before any construction begun, the site should be scrutinized by expert archaeologists which had not done previously. Besides, with the cooperation of government and constructor, all the artifacts have been excavated properly and preserved in scientific manner.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that owing to lack of financial support, remarkable amount of interesting sites left without any excavation. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes this point by clarifying the fact that according to the rule, any operation which undertake with the aim of initial examination of the constructions' sites should be financially supported by the constructor. Therefore, having earned more fund in addition to the governmental supports, archaeologists are able to do far more researches in comparison to the past.
Finally, the author asserts that so restrained is the job opportunities for archaeologists that they have been compelled to go for the jobs in other fields. The professor, though, dismisses this idea by subscribing to the point that nowadays the number of paid archaeologists has increased significantly. As a matter of fact, having engaged in various steps of construction sites including the examining, preserving, doing the research and data analyzing, the archaeologists can find the job in a variety fields which are not available in the past.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, conversely, finally, first, however, if, so, therefore, in addition, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 30.3222958057 175% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 326.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48159509202 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24599742817 2.5805825403 126% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59509202454 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7529348496 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.454545455 110.228320801 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6363636364 21.698381199 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197146376932 0.272083759551 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708870175099 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304205409786 0.0662205650399 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112075563914 0.162205337803 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207714645861 0.0443174109184 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.3589403974 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.1 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.42419426049 120% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 63.6247240618 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.2008830022 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.