TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task
Both the reading and article discuss the problem and limitation which archeology faced in Britain. According to the reading, the author provides three competing reasons to assert that there would be a problem in archeology back then, namely losing artifact, not be enough the financial support from the government, and difficulties in finding a job in archeology. On the contrary, the professor rejects all the three points provided by the author and asserts that the new rule which was enacted in Britain change the field of archeology and improve all three areas which are mentioned by the article.
Firstly, the reading passage points out that increasing the population in Britain causes a lot of construction which highly destroyed the valuable artifact. The lecturer, however, casts doubt on this claim by saying that the new rule states that before constructing and building the site should be examined by archeologist to know whether the site is valuable in term of archeology or not. Moreover, if the site is the interest of archaeologists the local government and the archeologist experts should gather together and make a plan to how to preserve that. Furthermore, they should examine and also study the site.
Secondly, the article claims that because the financial support from government is so low that the archeologist could not carry out any specific project on sites, and also the priorities of government changes. The lecture, in contrast, refutes this idea by arguing that the important part of the rule is the financial support which must be provided by a construction company and support the examination. In addition, the whole new source dedicates to this research, and this financial support allows archaeologist to go far greater in terms of investigating on site than past.
Finally, the author contends that archaeology job is very rare and it is very hard to find a suitable job in a university or in government agencies. By contrast, the speaker disagrees with this opinion and avers that this new rule paved the way for a lot job which is not available in the past. Additionally, the archaeologist can work and collaborate in all the stage process including preserve managing, processing data and publishing a new article. Therefore, increasing the jobs cause increasing the number of employed archaeologists; moreover, they receive the highest money in comparison to the past.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, in addition, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 7.30242825607 246% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 30.3222958057 175% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 1373.03311258 147% => OK
No of words: 390.0 270.72406181 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19230769231 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9477601566 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 145.348785872 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 419.366225166 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.6411125898 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.642857143 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 21.698381199 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209835378492 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700639136858 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0217794128308 0.0662205650399 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120198847716 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118768202668 0.0443174109184 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 63.6247240618 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.