Do you agree or disagree with the statement that governments should spend more money to improve internet access not on public transportation?
Since the dawn of humanity, human beings have been expecting from governments to implement something to make their life easier. With this in mind, a heated controversy exists over whether it is crucial for governments to improve internet access or improve public transportation. I, personally speaking, believe that it is significant for governments to invest money in improving internet access. I have some reason for this claim two of which are increasing the needs of people to internet access and improving the life quality. In the following paragraphs, I will substantiate my idea.
To begin with, nowadays, people have been using the Internet in a wide variety of subjects. Investing money to improve Internet access will facilitate this need. In other words, with the help of government, people can have accessibility to the internet more easily in comparison to the past. People surf the internet to improve their knowledge or acquire some information about their academic and personal life. Putting it differently, if a person has a disease, he or she can search on the Internet both to be aware of the consequences of disease and to find a way to cure the disease. Moreover, Students also use the Internet to find a solution to their problems. Finally, accessing the internet will be important for both academic and ordinary people.
The other equally significant reason worth mentioning is that by enhancing Internet access the quality of life will be increased. Having this opportunity will benefit Individuals who are going to do their regular task such as, paying checkm buying some stuff, and participating in class, to name but a few. Stating differently, by using the Internet, not only can people do their tasks easily, but they can save their time and money. Moreover, they can contribute to decreasing the air pollution and noise pollution by using the internet. Take my own experience as an illustrative examples. When I was a student, I decided to do all my task by not using the Internet. Consequlentl. after a while I found that it is wasting my time and money. I changed my mind by deciding to use The intenet for doing my tasks. From that time on, I have been using the internet. Using the internet bring abouts saving my time and money; in addition, not using my own car and public tranportation, I decrease the air and noise pollution. So signifanct will be using the intenert that no one can cast doubt on it.
All in all, by taking all the aforementioned reasons into account, one can conclude that it is significant for governments to invest money to improve internet access that to improve public transportation, for not only poeple need to have accessibility to internet but also the quality of life will be increased. I Firmly recommend goverment to improve internet access becasue it is crucial for all people in today's world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Internet) must be used with a third-person verb: 'accesses'.
Suggestion: accesses
...entioning is that by enhancing Internet access the quality of life will be increased. ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 582, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'example'?
Suggestion: example
...ke my own experience as an illustrative examples. When I was a student, I decided to do ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 683, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...y not using the Internet. Consequlentl. after a while I found that it is wasting my t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, so, while, in addition, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2389.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95643153527 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89467269447 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466804979253 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 769.5 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6362517016 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.56 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.28 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234825332999 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803928867529 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659706438318 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176435283617 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436429704289 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.