The article states that the United Kingdom was faced with severe problems and limitations with the science of archaeology and cultural artifacts, and provides three reasons. However, the professor says that three rules and guidelines have improved Britain.
First of all, the writer claims that a lot of beneficial artifacts were demolished due to construction work. However, the speaker says that new guideline states that examination is necessary before starting any construction projects. She explains that if there are archaeological value and interest available, then the builder and local government needs to get together and have to make a plan to preserve the artifacts before proceeding construction.
Second, the author posits that financial support was very little for archaeological research. On the other hand, the speaker says that construction company has to pay for the initial work, not by the government and, then all work have to do under preservation plane. The archaeological studies are done more than before did.
Third, the reading states that career was difficult in archaeology. However, the lecturer says that new guidelines allowed them for paying job that was not before. Now expert archaeologists are hired. The archaeologist gets an opportunity for work in Britain that is the highest far.
Essay evaluation report
new guideline states that examination is necessary
a new guideline states that an examination is necessary
new guidelines state that examinations are necessary
then the builder and local government needs to get together
then the builder and local government need to get together
before proceeding construction.
before proceeding construction projects.
-------------------
flaws:
Some sentences are hard to understand, like:
However, the lecturer says that new guidelines allowed them for paying job that was not before.
The archaeologist gets an opportunity for work in Britain that is the highest far.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 12 12
No. of Words: 205 250
No. of Characters: 1090 1200
No. of Different Words: 120 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.784 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.317 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.93 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 80 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 62 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 43 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.083 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.539 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.338 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.571 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.054 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, then, third, as to, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49756097561 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9814257436 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624390243902 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.3660609958 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9166666667 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29244079057 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101651046179 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459741084519 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172772611318 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205580561319 0.0443174109184 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.