TPO 47, Integrate writing
The article discusses pterosaurs, who could able to power flight or only able to glide. The author provides three arguments against powered flight and supports each of them. However, the lecturer states that pterosaurs may capable of powered and opposes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading claims that pterosaurs could have cold-blooded, which means that they were unable to produce energy and this energy helped to fly. On the contrary, the professor refutes that pterosaurs' fossil indicates that they have dense covering like as warm-blooded animals, which helps them to maintain the increase the blood circulation in severe clod environment. Therefore, he thinks that pterosaurs were to able to fly.
Second, the author asserts that pterosaurs could not be capable to flap their wings for a long time because they might have heavyweight like as giraffe. In contrast, the speaker says that anatomical features help them to fly. They have hollow bone instead of solid bone, which allow them to reduce the weight. That means, pterosaurs could able to flap their wings fast enough.
Finally, the writer declares that the powered flight animals can take off from the ground. Conversely, the professor opposing this point by saying that there is a difference between bird and pterosaurs. The bird can use their hind limbs and legs for walking on the ground and pterosaurs has using 4 limbs to use on the ground. He also mentions that modern flying uses their 4 legs. They do not use back one only, push 4 legs as well. That's why the lecturer says that scientific studies showed that pterosaurs are not only run fast but can also jump high into the air.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
who could able to power flight
who are able to power flight
the lecturer states that pterosaurs may capable of powered and opposes each of the author's reasons.
the lecturer states that pterosaurs may be capable of powered and opposes each of the author's reasons.
On the contrary, the professor refutes that ...
On the contrary, the professor refutes sb/sth. ..
refute, verb
disprove, rebut
for example:
his voice challenging his audience to rise and refute him
To refute the accusations, Ma went to a Hospital for a hymen test on February 6.
which helps them to maintain the increase the blood circulation
which helps them to maintain the increased blood circulation
pterosaurs were to able to fly.
pterosaurs were able to fly.
pterosaurs could not be capable to flap their wings
pterosaurs were not capable to flap their wings
pterosaurs could able to flap their wings fast enough.
pterosaurs are able to flap their wings fast enough.
Conversely, the professor opposing this point by saying that
Conversely, the professor is opposing this point by saying that
Conversely, the professor opposes this point by saying that
between bird and pterosaurs.
between birds and pterosaurs.
and pterosaurs has using 4 limbs to use on the ground.
and pterosaurs have been using 4 limbs to use on the ground.
and pterosaurs have 4 limbs to use on the ground.
modern flying uses their 4 legs.
modern ??? flying by their 4 legs.
They do not use back one only, push 4 legs as well.
They do not use back ones only, but push 4 legs as well.
pterosaurs are not only run fast but can also jump high into the air.
pterosaurs can not only run fast but also jump high into the air.
----------------------
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 13 2
You have some grammatical issues. Double check the essay after done the essay writing.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 20 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 13 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 12
No. of Words: 281 250
No. of Characters: 1358 1200
No. of Different Words: 157 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.094 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.833 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.342 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 91 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 63 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.562 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.791 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.688 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.336 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.548 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.163 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pterosaurs'' or 'pterosaur's'?
Suggestion: pterosaurs'; pterosaur's
...he contrary, the professor refutes that pterosaurs fossil indicates that they have dense c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: TO_TOO[5]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...erefore, he thinks that pterosaurs were to able to fly. Second, the author asse...
^^
Line 7, column 435, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...use back one only, push 4 legs as well. Thats why the lecturer says that scientific s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98932384342 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42151925965 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569395017794 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5101375391 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.625 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433865614751 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129978464845 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707167017642 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234513179566 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349532931418 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.