The reading states that the archaeology field suffers from many problems in Britain and provides three reasons of support. However, the lecturer explains that there are improvements and better changes in terms of the archaeology science and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading claims that the constructions projects may destroy possible precious places. However, the lecturer opposes this point by saying that before any building process starts the archaeologists examine the sites. in addition, they could put a plan to save any valuable objects.
Secondly, the article states that the funding for this field is not effective enough for researchers. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that there is an additional resource to support archaeology department like the constructions companies. these companies pay to archaeologists for the procedure that give them the permission to start building.
Thirdly, the article mentions that there is no adequate positions and jobs for archaeologists. However, the professor counters this point by saying there are a lot of opportunities to them to engage in many jobs, for example, to help in constructing sites examination, preserve the important findings there, and process the data further. So there are plenty of places to work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...s the archaeologists examine the sites. in addition, they could put a plan to save...
^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...tment like the constructions companies. these companies pay to archaeologists for the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 204.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48039215686 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9509966777 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578431372549 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2219284137 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.636363636 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202476793285 0.272083759551 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687542045915 0.0996497079465 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453054809314 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119870887704 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393448237074 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.