The reading states that Archaeologists who wanted to uncover and study old cultural artifacts in the United Kingdom was faced with serious problems and limitations during the twentieth century and provides three reasons for supporting. On the other hand, the professor clearly disagrees and refutes each author's reasons by saying that government adapted guide law in 1990 which solved all author's reasons.
Initially, the reading says that the growth of Britain's population, specially from the 1950s on, caused a lot of new built construction and these buildings blocked archaeologically valuable sites and many precious artifacts were therefore destroyed. However, the professor claims that by the new guide law builders have to announce their construction's sites to archaeologists, so they can examine their sites for seeing if they are archaeologically interests or not. If their sites were valuable, government and archaeologists gather around for digging those sites before buildings were started.
Second, the reading refers to financial problems that archaeologists were faced and claims that the reduction of archaeology budget levels eliminate archaeologically investigations, while the professor accounts this point and refers to guide law that all costs of archaeologically examinations must be paid by builders. The financial problems therefore are solved.
Last but not least, the reading states that there were never many careers available for archaeologists. People who wanted to become archaeologists ended up pursuing other careers. Contrary, the professor says that by this new guide law lots of new positions are available. Government need employment to value construction's sites and process of researches and writing documents and so on.
could you give me some
could you give me some examples of negative topic words?
'negative topic words' means
'negative topic words' means 'topic words' in sentences with negative sentiment:
I do not like this car. //'car' is the negative topic words
He is my enemy.//'enemy' is the negative topic words
'more negative topic words wanted' means it needs more ideas related to disagreement.
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.279151943463 0.261695866417 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.16961130742 0.158904122519 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0812720848057 0.0723426182421 112% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0459363957597 0.0435111971325 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.017667844523 0.0277247811725 64% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123674911661 0.128828473217 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0459363957597 0.0370669169778 124% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.21403646325 2.5805825403 125% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0247349823322 0.0208969081088 118% => OK
Particles: 0.00353356890459 0.00154638098197 229% => OK
Determiners: 0.0848056537102 0.128158765124 66% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0106007067138 0.0158828679856 67% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.017667844523 0.0114777025283 154% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1769.0 1645.83664459 107% => OK
No of words: 261.0 271.125827815 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.77777777778 6.08160592843 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.432950191571 0.374372842146 116% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.344827586207 0.287516216867 120% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.256704980843 0.187439937562 137% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.195402298851 0.113142543107 173% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21403646325 2.5805825403 125% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.539623497131 107% => OK
Word variations: 58.6413514657 53.8517498576 109% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 23.7272727273 21.7502111507 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.8429255514 49.3711431718 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.818181818 132.220823453 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 21.7502111507 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.727272727273 0.878197800319 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 58.210031348 50.5018328374 115% => OK
Elegance: 1.92424242424 1.90840788429 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.620670233698 0.549887131256 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.107999090322 0.142949733639 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0702607095161 0.0787303798458 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.575411732777 0.631733273073 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.175382135841 0.139662658121 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.264951381941 0.266732575781 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115229066982 0.103435571967 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.305341062765 0.414875509568 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0291320766216 0.0530846634433 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.433689412266 0.40443939384 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030567034589 0.0528353158467 58% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.