The main idea of both the passage and the lecture is about the probable effects of steady growth human beings population on the natural birds, especcially in the united states . Considering this, the author claims that . The professor, on the other hand, utterly denies whatever mentioned in the passsage through citing tree reasons.
First, both the passage and the lecture talk about destruction of birds natural inhabits by human's construction . According to the author, as human population continue to expand, we need more land for food. therefore, this practice destroy abundant place where bires used to be sheltered . Nontheless, the lecturer, rejects the author's view and illustrates that although some species of bird may lost their home, the urban area provided even better and larger house for other species . For example, many city dwellers complain about existance of birds in their houses.
Second of all, both the passage and the lecture discuss the issue increasing agriculture land for producing food which devour our wildlife . The passage goes on to mention that because of the less sutable land for birds for survive, their population have diclined. Nonetheless, the lecturer support the contradictory view as compared to that presented in passage; she describes that thanks to the latest agriculture developments, farmers can obtain more crops per unite of land, which is enable humen being not to demolish nature.
Finally, the passage and the lecture both discuss detrimental effect of hebicides on the birds. The author of passage states that erbecide can cause problem for birds by their food or water. However, the professor reubts it and says that, first, many new kind of herbecided have created which is no more dangerous for animals as well as birs, another thins is that scientist produce genetically modified crops which resistant to insects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...probable effects of steady growth human beings population on the natural birds, especc...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... birds, especcially in the united states . Considering this, the author claims tha...
^^
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...Considering this, the author claims that . The professor, on the other hand, utter...
^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...estruction of birds natural inhabits by humans construction . According to the author,...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... natural inhabits by humans construction . According to the author, as human popul...
^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... to expand, we need more land for food. therefore, this practice destroy abundant place w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t place where bires used to be sheltered . Nontheless, the lecturer, rejects the a...
^^
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...etter and larger house for other species . For example, many city dwellers complai...
^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...producing food which devour our wildlife . The passage goes on to mention that bec...
^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'enabled'.
Suggestion: enabled
... more crops per unite of land, which is enable humen being not to demolish nature. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, well, for example, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30872483221 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59960842992 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60067114094 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7300663517 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06452816374 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23773172819 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08469491343 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559161893253 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141158310198 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532235851386 0.0443174109184 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 63.6247240618 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.