TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task
Both the reading and the lecture discuss the effect of human population and agriculture growth on declining the birds' population. According to the reading, the author points out that the growth of human population an agricultural activity bring about a decline in the number of birds in the United States. The author provides three competing reasons to support his/her point of view, namely increasing human population and settlements, increasing agricultural activity, increasing the use of chemical pesticides. On the contrary, the professor rejects all three reasons by arguing that this claim in unconvincing and also proposes three alternative reasons.
Firstly, the reading passage asserts that increases in human population and settlements result in disappearing the birds' habitats. The lecture, however, refutes this point by saying that urban development provides better and large habitat for birds. As an example, people complain that there are a lot of birds such as pigeon are in the street. Moreover, the urban development does not cause uniform decline and consequently many birds shrink and others grow.
Secondly, the article avers that as population increase the agricultural activities must increase to support the growing human population. this growth of agriculture brings about the destruction of birds' habitats. The professor, by contrast, casts doubt on this idea by saying that it is true that agriculture cause the destruction but it is not happened by the way that the article mentions. Moreover, there are lessen less land that every year use as an agricultural site that this result from producing the same crop. Furthermore, producing more agricultural product per area the need for using more areas decrease.
Finally, the author claims that by increasing the agriculture the use of chemical pesticide increases which have negative effects on birds. The speaker, on the contrary, asserts that it is true that the pesticide has been using for a product but it would not increase to future and provide to change to defend her view. Firstly, a new much poisonous pesticide is not harmful to birds and just have an effect on growing pest and secondly, the new generation crop would not attractive to pests so the using of pesticide will decrease. Therefore, pesticides will not harm birds in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...and agriculture growth on declining the birds population. According to the reading, t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...o support the growing human population. this growth of agriculture brings about the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'lessened'.
Suggestion: lessened
...e article mentions. Moreover, there are lessen less land that every year use as an agr...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 576, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...erefore, pesticides will not harm birds in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, such as, by the way, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 1373.03311258 143% => OK
No of words: 369.0 270.72406181 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32791327913 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82689472543 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471544715447 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 607.5 419.366225166 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7330168212 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.647058824 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.82352941176 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466524780656 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158288452128 0.0996497079465 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902457235094 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27293726874 0.162205337803 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420764172389 0.0443174109184 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.7273730684 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.