The author of the reading states that steady increase on human population and use of agriculture and pesticides harm bird population. The professor, on the other hand, refutes each of the arguments made in the article.
First off, the reading believes that the increase of human population and settlement cause decrease on the bird population. The lecturer, however, points out that human expansion and settlements provide other birds with better and large habitat. You can even see birds such as hawks or pigeons on streets. So, some bird population may shrink but others increases. She also says that there is not unique decrease, but overall increase on birds population.
According to the article, since the human population constantly increases, agricultural activities also increases at the same time. Since wild places will convert agricultural areas, birds population will get influenced from this negatively. The speaker, by contrast, explains that fewer lands will be used for agricultural activities in the future because of new productive crops. Since they are more productive and effective in terms of productivity per specific land area, there will be no need to use more lands for agriculture.
Finally, the passage claims that since pesticides used in agriculture leak water sources or food chains of birds, they kill birds indirectly. the lecturer, however, points out that this will not be the same in the future. There are two changes in agriculture. First, farmers will use less toxic pesticides and second, scientists have developed pest-resistant crops, which do not need any pesticides. As a result, pesticides will not harm birds.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...s of birds, they kill birds indirectly. the lecturer, however, points out that this...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3754789272 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84036506426 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578544061303 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8060796608 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6875 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.555741373961 0.272083759551 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173362728554 0.0996497079465 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101845974388 0.0662205650399 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314553487307 0.162205337803 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348092557933 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.