TPO-06 - Integrated Writing Task Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific
The main idea of both the raedin and the lecture are about communal online encyclopedias. The reading states that there are some problems with these encyclopedias and provides some exapmles. The professor, on the contrarty, refutes all the reading's view and points out that these critisism about communal online encyclopedias are unfair.
First of all, The passge asserts that the authors of communal online encyclopedias have not any adequate academic information, so these encyclopedias are inaccurate. The lecturer, by contrast, refuses this problem by saying that if evereone needs to a comprehensive source he or she may not have this souce, but the erorrs of communal online encyclopedias are corrected by people.
Secondlt, the author of the reading claims that the information in the encyclopedias might be fabricated, deleted, and corrupted by vandals or hackers. The lecturer, on the other hand, averts that there are two solutions to avoid this situation. using a format that can not be changed by hackers, and special editor who cosider the communal online encyclopedias and eliminate false changes.
Eventually, the reading points out that the communal encyclopedias focus too frequently, and in too great a depth, pn popular topics. The professor, conversely, asserts that havin limit space on traditional encyclopedias results in focusing on important topics and issues, but this problem is not in communal online encyclopedias. therefore, the communal online encyclopedias can provide a great variety of topic. Moreover, there are a great diversity of peaople who can use these topicm, and this is the strongest advantage of communal online encyclopedias.
All in all, the reading says that communal online encyclopedias have some problemsl; however, the professor refutes them
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...cyclopedias and provides some exapmles. The professor, on the contrarty, refutes al...
^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Using
... two solutions to avoid this situation. using a format that can not be changed by hac...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 332, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...s not in communal online encyclopedias. therefore, the communal online encyclopedias can ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54347826087 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10034011048 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7365552167 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.692307692 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207958698543 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089296406067 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039979010357 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129200883763 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180350571354 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.8541721854 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.