TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task
Both the reading and the lecture discuss the advantages and disadvantages of methods by which the declining frog populations could be solved. The author believes that by implementing three methods it would be possible to prevent frog extinction. The professor, on the contrary, refuses those methods by saying that none of the proposed methods offer a practical solution and provides three reasons.
Firstly, the author asserts that frogs are being harmed by pesticides which are using in agriculture, and by passing laws, we can prohibit people from using this harmful material. The lecturer, by contrast, casts doubt on this claim by arguing that these laws would not be economical and fair because passing these laws bring about crop loss and the agricultures could not be able to compete in the markets. Moreover, this restrict regulation would have been severed disadvantages for people who are obligated to do it in comparison to other people who have no to do it since it causes the lower yield of product.
Secondly, the reading passage contends that fungus causes some problems for frogs and make them die of dehydration; therefore, frogs should be treated to remove these fungi from them. The lecturer, nonetheless, rejects this method by saying that the feasibility of this method is so low because each individual of frog must be treated and this is difficult. Moreover, capturing and treating the frog is another reason which makes this method not possible. Furthermore, offspring of frog must be treated, so this treatment should conduct again and again. Therefore, this method is much more complicated and expensive.
Finally, the reading passage avers claims that the habitat of frogs are being threatened because people use a great amount of water; so their habitat should be protected from over using of water by the human. The professor, by contrast, holds this opinion that this method would not solve the problem and refuses this claims. Moreover, the professor says that using water by the human from this wetland is not the biggest threat, the biggest threat is global warming that contributes to the extinction of frogs. Additionally, prohibition of human from using the water is unlikely to prevent the changing of frog population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... in comparison to other people who have no to do it since it causes the lower yiel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.4613686534 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1373.03311258 138% => OK
No of words: 367.0 270.72406181 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17438692098 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67526369506 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493188010899 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 569.7 419.366225166 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8378743489 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.6 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4666666667 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358865726572 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137017986453 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967536235131 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222067978276 0.162205337803 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510881684347 0.0443174109184 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 63.6247240618 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.