TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task
The population of frogs is declining over years, and reading provides us three methods to solve the problem of declining frog populations. However, the professor in the listening claims that none of those three methods are practical, and she gives specific reasons to support her ideas.
Firstly, the reading argues that the use of pesticides harms frog which causes their population declined. On the other hand, professor refutes the reading stating that it is not economical good options. According to the professor, farmers who live near the frog habitats have to obey the strict rules will be less competitive to those farmers who live in other area and have a low yield.
Secondly, the reading suggest to use large scale treatments to protect sensitive frogs from infection of fungus. The professor holds the opposite view, stating that it is very difficult to capture each individual frogs and apply treatments on them. Besides, the fungus can be passed to their offspring, so the whole treatment project can be very complicated and expensive.
Thirdly, the reading passage claims that the frog habitats are threatened by human activities, such as excessive water use or draining of wetland. On the contrary, professor points out that the truth theat to habitats is global warming. Therefor, forbidding humans from using water and develop near the habitats can't help frogs to recover their populations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | Hem | 3 | view |
| 2019-03-02 | fatimamsy | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | mahi22 | 81 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | tabatabaei777 | 83 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | chensixian | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree: young people should try many different kinds of jobs or career before they decide the long term career of their life. 76
- Do you agree or disagree: young people should try many different kinds of jobs or career before they decide the long term career of their life. 76
- Essay topics: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
- TPO-45 Integrated Writing Task 14
- TPO-45 Integrated Writing Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...specific reasons to support her ideas. Firstly, the reading argues that the use...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve in other area and have a low yield. Secondly, the reading suggest to use lar...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can be very complicated and expensive. Thirdly, the reading passage claims that...
^^
Line 4, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or draining of wetland. On the contrary, professor points out that the truth thea...
^^
Line 4, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... out that the truth theat to habitats is global warming. Therefor, forbidding hum...
^^
Line 4, column 316, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ing water and develop near the habitats cant help frogs to recover their populations...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1185.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22026431718 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62944305391 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5859030837 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6302378239 49.2860985944 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.727272727 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 7.06452816374 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432273721946 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16696911482 0.0996497079465 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128777886721 0.0662205650399 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247481774244 0.162205337803 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516790153541 0.0443174109184 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.