Both the reading and listening materials discuss the population of birds. To be more specific, the reading believes that the population of birds are decreasing, whereas the lecturer holds a different ideas and thinks that the reading’s arguments are unconvincing.
To begin with, the passages supports its argument by stating that along with the expansion of human population and settlements, wild areas for birds such as forest, grassland are being decline. The professor in the lecture refutes this ideas and says that the reading is groundless. In fact, the growth of big city creates new behavior some birds for them to adapt the city life; people today can even see birds on street or the roof of building. As a results, some type of birds decreased in numbers, but others one raised up their population instead.
Furthermore, on the contrary with the reading’s point is that human agricultural activities limit birds living areas, the lecturer claims that people use less land for crops nowadays. In fact, they are developing a new type of crop that have more products on one plant.
Finally, the passage finishes by claiming that pesticides, poison used to kill insects, are greatly damages birds because it appears in the water and food chain. In contrast, the reading says that this notion is unreliable. He further foster his argument by stating that people invented a less toxic chemical already, so birds life will be more safety. Moreover, pesticide plants do not harm birds.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e. The professor in the lecture refutes this ideas and says that the reading is grou...
^^^^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...s on street or the roof of building. As a results, some type of birds decreased in number...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, if, moreover, so, whereas, as for, in contrast, in fact, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13821138211 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69324205734 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605691056911 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1621403787 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.333333333 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06452816374 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342232717365 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107030058707 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061880491423 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190851497347 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567334158219 0.0443174109184 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.