The reading passage states that the population of birds in the United State are reducing due to the increase use of pesticide, whereas the lecture points out that the reasons in the passage are not convincing.
Firstly, the author insists that since the human populations and settlements will continue to aggrandize, thus more habitats of birds will be devastated. The professor, however, argues that urban development virtually provide better living condition for birds. And many birds' number even increase such as, seagull. In addition, many species can maintain themselves by preying the rodents and other creatures in cities. Therefore, the population of some species may decline while other species will thrive.
Secondly, the reading says that to synchronize with the grow number of people, more habitats of birds will be devastated. In contrast, the speaker reckons that actually there is less and less land used in agriculture. Human now tend to introduce more productive crops which less land are needed to produce food. In this way, the birds will not lose their habitats.
Lastly, the author deems that pesticide can get into water and food chain for birds. With the increase use of it, more birds will die from contaminated water or cannot produce posterity successfully. The professor rebuts the assertion by saying that people currently are aware the consequence of pesticide. So we have implemented two practice to reduce the detriment. Now new and more less toxic insecticide are used, and genetic modified crops which will not harm birds at all are designed to resist insect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e reading says that to synchronize with the grow number of people, more habitats of bird...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 381, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'less' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: less
...ce to reduce the detriment. Now new and more less toxic insecticide are used, and genetic...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23346303502 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63546230371 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587548638132 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3886616511 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6666666667 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1333333333 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422932855951 0.272083759551 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130149020911 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101574276374 0.0662205650399 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233519944228 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659179107932 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.