TPO-17In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States—birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are li

Essay topics:

TPO-17

In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States—birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely to continue, with the result that the number of birds in the United States will necessarily decline.

The lecturer challenges the topic proposed in the reading that the number of birds in the united states will necessarily decline. And she thinks that these arguments are unconvincing.

First, the passage suggests that birds natural habitats will continue to disappear due to expansion of human populations and settlements. However, the professor points out that it would provide larger and better habitats for birds. some birds would increase and stand on the street and some hawks would prey on other birds such as pigeons. Thus, some birds' population would shrink whereas other birds' population would increase.

Second, the essay supposes that agricultural activities must increase to keep pace with the growing human population. But the lecturer supports that there are less and less land which used for agriculture every year in the united states. And new crops are introduced to supply for food, so people need not to destroy wilderness area.

Third, the article indicates that the use of chemical pesticides will also increase. Nevertheless, the professor argues that people aware the harm of traditional pesticides, so they make some changes. new pesticides are developed that have no harmful effects on birds. Moreover, pest-resistant crops are planted, which would reduce the need of pesticides that harm birds.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...e larger and better habitats for birds. some birds would increase and stand on the s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...other birds such as pigeons. Thus, some birds population would shrink whereas other b...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'destroy'?
Suggestion: destroy
... to supply for food, so people need not to destroy wilderness area. Third, the article i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: New
... pesticides, so they make some changes. new pesticides are developed that have no h...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, third, thus, whereas, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 207.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41062801932 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67940491839 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589371980676 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.0935837294 49.2860985944 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.1538461538 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9230769231 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427834044512 0.272083759551 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130848659793 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785845271712 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212191118766 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332798818798 0.0443174109184 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.