TPO 18-2
Although the author claims three main hypotheses to support the cause of of declination of an evergreen tree of Torreya taxifoha in Florida and the ways of their protection, the professor finds them dubious and brings up three reasons to refute them all.
Firstly, the reading material holds the view that reestablish of trees in the same place which caused to change the microclimate condition from a dryer climate to cooler. However, the professor finds them unconvincing and asserts that it is not a satisfactory way because these trees are readily affected by global warming which changes the overall climate.
Furthermore, the reading passage argues that locating them to some far places will give them the advantage of being in cooler climate which is proper for them. In contrast, the lecturer believes that moving them to other places is extremely likely to kill almost other plants and endanger species. For example, when black locust was moved to another habitant, it almost destroyed all plants and caused them to extinct.
Eventually, the author claims that preserve them in research center would be a great idea in order to protect them from extinction. Conversely, the speaker states that research centers do not have the capacity for relatively high and divers trees in long run due to the lack of facilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...ee main hypotheses to support the cause of of declination of an evergreen tree of Tor...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lants and endanger species. For example, when black locust was moved to another h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 218.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11926605505 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58533347221 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619266055046 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.306289255 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.5 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179507593313 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752838087938 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305720341067 0.0662205650399 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10431731075 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172820768593 0.0443174109184 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.