According to the reading, the Torreya taxifolia, which is a type of evergreen tree commonly prevailent in Florida is declining. Experts suggest that there are three ways to address this decline. On the otherhand, the lecturer argues that all three proposed solution is not effective by providing contradicting examples against each of them.
First, the reading proposes to reestablish Torreya in the same location, i.e Florida, where it thrived for thousands of years. However, the lecturer disputes this opinion with a counter example. She points out that the areas in Florida where the trees once thrived are strongly affected by climatic conditions caused by global warming. Moreover, she adds that the areas are becoming drier and this inhibits the sustainability of Torreya in the proposed location.
Second, the reading suggests to replant the Torreya in forests further north where the temperature is significantly cooler. Nevertheless, the lecturer disagrees with this solution. She mentions that Black Locust tree, which was facing a similar decline, was moved to northern location for cooler climate resulting in adverse scenario. The replanting resulted in rapid growth of Black Locust that killed the other endangered trees in that area.
Finally, the reading claims that the Torreya can be preserved in research centers. In contrast, the lecturer points out that the Torreya will not have resistance to diseases. Further, she says that there must be large and genetically diverse quantity of Torreya for being able to defend itself against diseases.
In conclusion, the lecturer is in disagreement with the reading about the methods to preserve Torreya and effectively challenges the main points made by the reading by providing substantial examples.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggests replanting'.
Suggestion: suggests replanting
...oposed location. Second, the reading suggests to replant the Torreya in forests further north wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50549450549 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77315747726 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567765567766 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2284240273 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.2 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369230225376 0.272083759551 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128547395201 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087317422437 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195270300203 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780072054666 0.0443174109184 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.