The reading passage states three ways to prevent the Torreya from extinction, whereas the lecture points out that these solution are not satisfactory.
Firstly, the author insists that we can reestablish Torreya in Northern Florida where the microclimate is hospitable to the specie's grow. The professor, however, argues that this practice is unlikely to be successful. The Northern Florida used to have a damp and cool environment; nevertheless, owing to the global warming and other factors, the weather in there now become drier. Thus Torreya cannot survive without its original environment.
Secondly, the reading says that using a method called assisted migration to relocate the specie towards a more suitable condition will help it to thrive. In contrast, the speaker rebuts it by specifying an example. People used to exert this implement to help black locust tree. But the tree spread so fast that kill far more other trees which are also endangered. In this way, the practice may bring unpredictable outcome.
Lastly, the author deems that we can conserve Torreya in research centers where scientists can do research and assure the survival of it. On the contrary, the professor reckons that the specie cannot resist the disease when it is kept in research centers. For a specie to survive, it must have a large population and possess a high genetic diversity. While the scientists have not enough capacity to take such a large sample across varied areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this solution' or 'these solutions'?
Suggestion: this solution; these solutions
...on, whereas the lecture points out that these solution are not satisfactory. Firstly, the a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... the weather in there now become drier. Thus Torreya cannot survive without its orig...
^^^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n and possess a high genetic diversity. While the scientists have not enough capacity...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1974789916 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68504490454 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9125414227 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3571428571 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06452816374 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324219767049 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874207486265 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644941007933 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168285261369 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592614220453 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.