The reading passage states that implement new policies to handling and storing coal ash is not necessary and might have negative effect, whereas the professor points out that creating new and much stricter regulations is definitely needed.
Firstly, the author insists that the exist environment regulations is effective and not need to be changed. For instance, companies are required to use liner a special material to prevent detrimental chemical from leaking into environment. The professor, however, argues that the current rules is not sufficient for they only require newly build landfills and ponds to equip liner while these old dispose sites without liner might cause significant damage such as, the coal ash leak into water and then contaminate the drinking water. So implementing much stricter regulations is imperative.
Secondly, the reading says that the current recycle process is not dangerous to the environment and with the using of stricter rules may make consumers feel skeptical about these products and influence their selling. In contrast, the speaker reckons that new policies do not mean that consumers will stop buying their product. Take mercury as an example. Mercury is a hazardous material and has subjected to strict rules for long time. However, consumers continue to buy it due to its successfully and safely recycle process.
Lastly, the reading states that the companies will undertake more cost if the new rules are implemented. On the contrary, the professor deems that it is true that the cost will increase, but the result will be well-worth the cost. The companies might have to spend extra fifteen million dollars attribute to the new regulations, however, it is only increase about one percent of average household electricity bill, which is worthwhile to do.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ed. Firstly, the author insists that the exist environment regulations is effective an...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, whereas, while, for instance, in contrast, such as, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33566433566 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71445796939 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594405594406 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.3388401052 49.2860985944 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.384615385 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3076923077 7.06452816374 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434305388812 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118905246321 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753554466379 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232325064017 0.162205337803 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089756159841 0.0443174109184 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.