Both the reading and the lecturer discuss the ways of saving Torreya taxifoha, which was a common tree in Florida, from becoming extinct. The author of the reading states three arguments considered by experts to solve this problem. The professor, however, finds them unsatisfactory.
The first way suggested by the text is to reestablish Torreya taxifoha to another place in which it can grow. The lecturer, however, points out that in recent decades, the climate changed because either global warming has increased or wetlands have been drained. So; most areas became drier for the Torreya taxifoha.
Another way for the Torreya taxifoha's survival is moving it to the entirely different area. The speaker, on the other hand, draws attention to the same experiment. Once a plant called Black Locust tree was moved to different habitat for the same purpose. In the end, it spread dramatically and killed many other species and causes them to be a line on being extinct.
Lastly, the reading claims that it can be preserved in a research center by providing proper circumstances. The professor, by contrast, believes that the Torreya taxifoha will not be able to resist diseases because it needs a larger and more diversified habitat. A research center will not capable of providing these opportunities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... however, finds them unsatisfactory. The first way suggested by the text is to r...
^^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... to another place in which it can grow. The lecturer, however, points out that in r...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19339622642 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73995706546 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61320754717 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8503870448 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6923076923 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3076923077 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76923076923 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359434378683 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11540763121 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905254241826 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198802386705 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213600165519 0.0443174109184 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.