TPO 19 Integrated
The speaker explains three arguments opposing points stated in the reading passage about the buzzing's harmful impact on both buzzers and customers. As he states, buzzing not only helps companies to sell their products, but also gives useful information to potential customers.
First, the reading passage states that potential customers may receive incorrect information through buzzers who are just talk in support of paid advertises. However, the speaker brings some reasons to reject this claim. He states that buzzers are typical users of company's products. They spread positive word of mouth in favor of products because buzzers believe that these products are in good quality and worthy to buy. So, this critic has been repudiates by the speaker.
Second, the speaker opposes the idea presented in the reading passage about the consumers' vulnerability in purchase decision-making procedure because they may approve buzzer's statements in favor of the product. As he states, consumers usually ask a lot of question to know whether the product benefits from reasonable price or high quality services or not. If consumers do not convince, they will not intend to purchase the product. Hence, this idea has been rejected by the speaker too.
Third and last, the speaker asserts that buzzers are being paid by companies because their products are good. If they do not offer high quality products, buzzers would not eager to be hired by such companies. As he states, buzzers are people who have good experiences in using a product and they want to share their own experiences with people which may trigger consumers to purchase the product. They are trustful and open to respond individual's concerns about the product. These explanations were against the reading passage's claim about destructive influence of buzzing on social relationships due to spreading mistrust and dishonesty.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
...sented in the reading passage about the consumers vulnerability in purchase decision-maki...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34563758389 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6642118654 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543624161074 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.5218620186 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5625 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368481109821 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119562445971 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070562348654 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223543776534 0.162205337803 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998326997902 0.0443174109184 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.