The passage states that buzzers, people who are hired by a company to sell their products, have many critics and introduces three points for support. However, the listening says that the author's point of view about buzzing is misleading and casts doubt on all of the author's specific points that are as follows:
First, the author posits that consumers should know if that person is being paid by a company or not, which makes a significant difference to the consumers. The speaker, who works as a buzzer, contends this point by stating that buzzers first use the product and evaluate its goodness; thereafter, they can be hired as buzzers. Even though buzzers get paid by companies, they support a certain product after they have used it and then make their honest own impression to the consumers.
Secondly, the author mentions that because buzzers pretend they are private people, consumers become less critical in their judgment to the products. Conversely, the speaker refutes this point by saying that consumers are more critical that it is expected. They ask many questions regard the product's quality, price, and more before they buy it. Thus, people have their freedom to make a decision and it is not true that consumers being misled or forced by buzzers.
Lastly, in contrary to the author believes that buzzers are most likely to harm the social relationship in a community, the speaker rejects this claim by stating that buzzers can enhance people's trust when they buy products to meet their expectation.
All in all, according to the listening, the argument that buzzers are misleading to consumers is not as negative as it is described by the author's specific points.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...uzzing is misleading and casts doubt on all of the authors specific points that are as fol...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ors specific points that are as follows: First, the author posits that consumers ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03202846975 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52730682671 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533807829181 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.2963799917 49.2860985944 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.4 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1 21.698381199 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396105861196 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158249264742 0.0996497079465 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493432587771 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205541441901 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990512177246 0.0443174109184 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.