The reading and the listening are about buzzing which is defined as the process of hire the buzzers by advertisement companies to promote their products. The author believe that it is a controversial idea and he provides three bad affects of this. The lecturer challenges the statement made by the author. He is of opinion that it is not mis-leading endorsement idea.
First of all, the writer suggests that paid advertisement, which are done by buzzers, can be presented incorrect information about buzzing thing. The lecturer, however, refutes the idea that company hires that people which use and like their products, so information renders by them is not wrong or mis-leading.
Secondly, the writer claims that people who are hired as buzzers act as private person and for that reason, most of the people believe in them and later on, can be harmed. The speaker, on the other hand, rejects this point by asserting that scenario is totally opposite as presented in the reading. He says that people asked a lot more detailed question about product including price, value, and how long can be use etc. So, it is not easy to convince them.
In the last, it is stated that social relationship has been mistrusted when individuals come to know about their hidden agenda. On the flip side, the lecturer, doubts the point by asserting that if product is not good enough then no company will advertise it. He further highlights the idea by saying that when people try buzzing products and find their good quality as it is mentioned by the buzzer, they feel the loyal and trustworthy approach. Hence, it improves the relationships.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...s to promote their products. The author believe that it is a controversial idea and he ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... he provides three bad affects of this. The lecturer challenges the statement made ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93115942029 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67912917649 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572463768116 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3047827944 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2142857143 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264041983964 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732933368423 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604136887157 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147187054984 0.162205337803 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343768582019 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.