The reading states that gathering people in a group can be more effective than individuals and provides three reasons for it. However, the professor explains that putting individuals in a group is not a good idea and refutes each if the reading reasons.
First, the reading avers that a group people will have more experience to deal with every possible problem. nevertheless, the professor cast doubt on the reading purport by providing an example of two company. He explains that the proficiency of two groups were investigated for 6 months. the first group didn't show a good efficiency. the second group that has good performance were analyzed through their members and every one of them refutes the passage idea.
Second, the passage claims that a group can do jobs in a short time and faster that an individual. however, the professor refutes this point. He avers that people in a group needs more time to finalize their idea. He says that more meeting is necessary to achieve an idea and that is a complete waste of time.
Third, the reading asserts that a group of people will emerge more creative idea due to variety of people and different mind also it mentions that in a group all the people are united in a same voice. Nonetheless, the professor cast doubt on these. He explains that all the people in a group must admit the idea, even though they think that it won’t be a good idea. After the acceptance if the program fails all of the member in group are responsible for that and this is not the meaning of creative, were some people agree and some not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...ce to deal with every possible problem. nevertheless, the professor cast doubt on the readin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 289, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... groups were investigated for 6 months. the first group didnt show a good efficienc...
^^^
Line 2, column 305, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...estigated for 6 months. the first group didnt show a good efficiency. the second grou...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 335, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...rst group didnt show a good efficiency. the second group that has good performance ...
^^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ort time and faster that an individual. however, the professor refutes this point. He a...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 413, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ter the acceptance if the program fails all of the member in group are responsible for tha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6726618705 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48719353292 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482014388489 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.14286345 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.