TPO 20
The reading passage claims that "let it burn" policy caused several damages in 1988. However, the lecturer casts serious doubts on this claim by presenting some counter-arguments and examples. She believes that this policy is not only destructive but also create a good situation in Yellowstone.
On the first place, the lecturer contends that this forest fire made a good base for growing new plants also they diversity increase in the fast rate. She provides an example of one type trees that after burning make a good space for cultivating other plants moreover one seed which germinates in the heat situation, thus by this advance various type of planets appear after that fire. This, however, is contradicted to the reading passage mentions that Yellowstone fires caused tremendous damage to the park's trees and other vegetation.
On the other hand, it is noted in the passage that the park wildlife affected as well by Yellowstone fires additionally make it impossible for the animals that survive the fire to return. In contrast, she clearly states that Yellowstone fire recovered the animal's population due growing the different types of plants which make the ideal habitats for animals. For instance, enhance in the number of the rabbits which can improve the population of predators which use these rabbits as a source of food.
Finally, the speaker points out that this Yellowstone fire was the combination of the numerous factor like low rainfall, strong wind and dry undergrowth, hence that massive fires do not happen every year and did not make any problem for tourists. Nonetheless, the text asserts that the fire compromised the value of the park, so decrease the number of the tourists because they decided to stay away from this forest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage claims that 'let it burn' policy caused se...
^^
Line 2, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n' policy caused several damages in 1988. However, the lecturer casts seriou...
^^
Line 6, column 257, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...tes that Yellowstone fire recovered the animals population due growing the different ty...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, thus, well, for instance, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14878892734 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67765970055 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574394463668 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3005163077 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.272727273 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8181818182 7.06452816374 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344072704788 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133723042684 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770098964801 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198752000354 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505090240999 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.