The author discusses that "let it burn" policy were criticized and should be replaced as Yellowstone fires caused much damage. However, the speaker displays a contradictory view that the fires make a creative and good fundamention for nature.
First, the passage says that the fires gave rise to tremendous damage to the park's trees and vegetation. But the lecture challenges this idea by providing the truth that new plants took over the open unshield space and some seeds germinated under high temperature.
Second, the writer indicates that wildlife was affected, and it is impossible for animals to return as the habitats were destructed, the food chains were disturbed. To render disproof, the lecturer reveals that the fires provided an ideal habitat for rabit and hare, which were thriving later, and therefore the food chain became strong. This further refutes the example in the reading.
Last, the passage says that the fires leaded to less tourists and made the local economy suffer. Whereas the lecture contends that the fires were the combinations of all factors, such as low rainful, winds. On the contrary, the tourists grew, and this overturns the writer’s concept.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or nature. First, the passage says that the fires gave rise to tremendous damage...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er refutes the example in the reading. Last, the passage says that the fires le...
^^^
Line 6, column 49, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun tourists is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...e passage says that the fires leaded to less tourists and made the local economy suf...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, whereas, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 30.3222958057 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 191.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30366492147 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63080539574 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.65445026178 0.540411800872 121% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4786605951 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.3 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319904821938 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11005905223 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793340669249 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17429019344 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577518843406 0.0443174109184 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.