According to the reading passage, genetic modified trees give huge benefits. However, According to the lecture, genetic modified trees get the serious problems and disadvantages out weight to the advantages of genetic modification process. The lecturer contradicts to each point of the article.
First, the article implies that genetic modified trees more chance to survive than natural trees. The lecturer, in contrast, mentions that genetic modified trees resistant to some specific condition but not sure for all conditions. Non modified trees are very diverse and some threaten condition some species resistant to this condition and survive. Some natural trees survive, even though some species are kill by threaten condition. But this is not possible for genetic modified tress because they uniform diverse. This trees exposure in the climate variation and new pest areas they unable to survive and wipe out whole species in the area.
Second, the reading passage emphasizes that genetic modified trees gives economic profit. The lecturer, on contrary, explains that company take high cost for genetic modified seed than non genetic modified seed and according to the law, farmers have to pay every years to company for genetic modified plants. So, it is not beneficial for farmer.
Third, the reading passage includes that increase the growth of wild trees and protect the endanger native and rare trees. The lecturer argue this point and states that genetic modified trees negative effect for wild trees because genetic modifies trees growing rapidly than natural trees. The natural trees compete with genetic modifies tress for soil, nutrition, sunlight, and water. Crowding genetic modified trees caused less space for natural trees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 88, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...se the growth of wild trees and protect the endanger native and rare trees. The lecturer arg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...ger native and rare trees. The lecturer argue this point and states that genetic modi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4907063197 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35271054045 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501858736059 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9200678984 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3125 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8125 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.06452816374 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.533486601257 0.272083759551 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217728571807 0.0996497079465 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116107839914 0.0662205650399 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.366856205904 0.162205337803 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759706627236 0.0443174109184 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.