The reading passages discusses an interesting topic about genetic modification and how this use improves trees plantation and provides three reasons for support its benefits. However, the lecture casts doubts on the claims made by the article. She thinks that genetic modification brings some benefits to tree farmers, but also brings many damages, and she refutes each of the reason given by the article.
First, the reading passages sustains that genetic modification makes trees stronger to survive based on that an artificial modification could achieve the elimination of an obstacle for its grow and development, like creating antibodies for a pest. On the contrary, the lecture questions this point explaining how difficult it would be for a species without any diversity in its genetic to survive a catastrophic event. Moreover, while wild plant have a bank of diversity DNA, the possibility of one or two to survive could be possible against those generation that have an homogeneous type of bank of genes.
Secondly, the reading passage argues that genetic modification brings economic benefits to the tree farmers because of the improvement in fruit production or shorter time in develop the plan to an adult. On the other hand, the lecture questions this argument by mentioning that the seeds under the genetic modification is a product with a patent that has a price to be charge every time farmers want to plant a tree.
Finally, the reading passage exposes as a benefit the idea of over exploitation in case of using a plantation with genetic modification because of the faster growing of this type of trees. Challenging this point, the lecture warms this use by explaining how a faster, stronger plant could produce a terrible damage when competing for water, space and other resources used by other species that could disappear in consequence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this generation' or 'those generations'?
Suggestion: this generation; those generations
...wo to survive could be possible against those generation that have an homogeneous type of bank o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 571, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ible against those generation that have an homogeneous type of bank of genes. S...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.01324503311 339% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18874172185 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81804421282 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526490066225 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.0383885778 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.7 110.228320801 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2 21.698381199 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 7.06452816374 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338216519428 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139596736146 0.0996497079465 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599020859685 0.0662205650399 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212772784687 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254298493984 0.0443174109184 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.3589403974 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 53.8541721854 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.0289183223 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.