The text mentions about the genetic modified (GM) trees and their benefits on today's society. According to the text, GM trees are more likely to survive to adverse pests and certain clime, they also tend to have better environment resistance. Also they have cost benefits and stop over exploitation of wood. However, the lecturer strong disagree with all the points presented in the text and also give examples of it.
Firstly, the text stated that genetic modified trees are tougher and more resistance than natural trees. The lecture contradicts the text saying that GM trees are design to be uniform and therefore it only adapts to certain types of clime and new pests. Natural trees are more likely to survive a bigger range of adversest.
Secondly, the text stated the cost benefits associated with GM trees. As the trees are likely design to grow faster and give more fruits in a short period of time, farmers will have better results with it. The lecturer refutes this statement, stating the cost benefits are not that great if you compare the price of normal seeds with GM seeds, which are much more expensive. Also, by law farmers must always buy the seeds from authorized producers .
Thirdly, according to the text GM trees avoid over exploitation of wood and can preserve the environment. The lecturer refutes this idea arguing that GM trees grow aggressively and compete with natural trees for resources, such as: water, minerals and nutrients for the overall nature.
To conclude, the lecturer advocates against all the tree points presented by the text and reaffirm the benefits to plant natural trees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...modified GM trees and their benefits on todays society. According to the text, GM tree...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... to have better environment resistance. Also they have cost benefits and stop over e...
^^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... faster and give more fruits in a short period of time, farmers will have better results with ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... buy the seeds from authorized producers . Thirdly, according to the text GM tree...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9962962963 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42167088239 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514814814815 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.05181149 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3571428571 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302870371827 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119876051376 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903747163107 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183330893936 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655673065663 0.0443174109184 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.