The reading states that genetically modified trees have several benefits. However, the professor raises serious counter-arguments to the reading stated benefits as listed below:
First, the passage states that genetically modified trees are hardier and long-term survival trees, in comparison to natural trees. The professor refutes this point by saying that genetically modified trees cannot withstand the harsh conditions because these trees are not exposed to it before. Indeed, when exposed to some environmental challenges, genetically modified trees may wipe out completely, as the opposite to natural trees.
Secondly, the author mentions that genetically modified trees have an economic benefit to farmers. Conversely, the lecturer contends by saying that there are hidden costs of doing a genetic modification on trees. Farmers are charged more for genetically modified seeds than the seeds of natural trees. Moreover, farmers must pay every time they plant their genetically modified seeds, which is considered as a law. Thus, planting genetically modified trees is expensive for farmers, which opposes the reading point.
Finally, contrary to the belief in the reading passage that genetically modified trees benefit wild trees, the professor argues against this point by stating that it does more damage to than benefit. The lecturer mentions that modified trees grow aggressively rapid and compete with natural trees in their traces and natural resources; thus, modified trees could impact natural trees living.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reading stated benefits as listed below: First, the passage states that genetical...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79646017699 5.08290768461 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70371000145 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53982300885 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.793863103 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.090909091 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.497837130653 0.272083759551 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.235844778043 0.0996497079465 237% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554332039823 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329795310099 0.162205337803 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986322070745 0.0443174109184 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.8541721854 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.0289183223 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.2367328918 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.