The reading states that the elephant-sized edmontosaur left the harsh winter climate on Alaska's North Slope one hundred million years ago in order to survive. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this claim and says these animals stayed on the same place. He refutes each of the author's specific points by arising several counter-arguments that as listed below.
First of all, the author posits that the edmontosaur escaped the place in order to find food. These animals mainly feed on plants and plants weren't available on this extremely cold winter. Conversely, the professor confutes this hypothesis by stating that there were growing of some plants in the region. He adds that in the past the temperature was warmer than today in the Arctic region, which had created a good condition for plants to grow. Moreover, plants could get benefit from the dead plants and used its natural values to grow in the harsh climate. Therefore, this hypothesis did not convince the professor.
Secondly, the passage points out that there were many edmontosaur remedies have been discovered in different zones as herds. This claim supports the hypothesis of their migration. The professor contends on this premise by explaining that does not mean these animals have lived in herds. The reason behind this discovery because to get extra protection and did not migrate.
Last but not least, the reading hypothesis states that edmontosaurs had a locomotive power that helped them to move to a warmer climate and migrate there. The lecturer argues against this theory by saying that it is not possible for young edmontosaurs to have this power and move for migration. They are still not mature enough to travel. And it is not plausible for adult edmontosaurs leaving their young behind. Therefore, edmontosaurs did not go anywhere and survive in their same place.
All in all, according to the professor, all of the hypothesizes that provided by the author was not convincing enough and edmontosaurs did not leave their region.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...nimals mainly feed on plants and plants werent available on this extremely cold winter...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 41, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...All in all, according to the professor, all of the hypothesizes that provided by the autho...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 330.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1303030303 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65534960838 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4096230823 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1052631579 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3684210526 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316848779425 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879044851038 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607440790346 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160760525567 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601967769921 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.