The reading passage provides three solutions to prevent birds' injuries caused by glass. However, the lecturer in the listening argues against these solutions and states that none of them will effectively stop the problem.
First, the author posits that replacing the regular glass by one-way glass is a perfect solution. Conversely, the lecturer refutes this solution and says that one-way glass is bad as the regular glass. as well. He explains that birds from outside see reflections from one-way glass like a mirror and will get injuries as if they insight the reflection is real. Some reflections such as sky or tree. Thus, it is still not a good solution to the problem.
Second, the author claims that colorful lines on regular window glass is a possible solution because birds will see these lines as barriers to avoid flying through glass. The lecturer does not believe this claim is plausible to solve the issue. He points out that there is a problem with these colorful stripes on windows which birds would think it as some of opening holes and then flying to it. Even if architects make them extremely small, it would become very dark inside the building. Thus, the author claimed is not plausible solution to the problem.
Lastly, the author mentions that creating magnetic field is helpful to guide birds away from buildings. The speaker does not believe this solution work; this is because it is only effective with long distance trips. Birds in these trips can use magnetic field to travel from cold area to warm area, for instance. However, this method is not working in short trips because birds uses their eyes and bright lights to navigate themselves.
All in all, according to the listening, the provided solutions by the author to prevent birds' injuries are not effective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...-way glass is bad as the regular glass. as well. He explains that birds from outsi...
^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “as” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...-way glass is bad as the regular glass. as well. He explains that birds from outsi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, lastly, second, so, still, then, thus, well, for instance, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98675496689 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35745776685 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526490066225 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.997530788 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5882352941 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446532007047 0.272083759551 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125704322457 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104509680145 0.0662205650399 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220664379504 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822093125018 0.0443174109184 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.