In the lecture, the professors thinks planting genetically modified tress on large scale cause problems and the benefied mentioned in the reading passage may not be as true.
First and foremost, it is true the genetically modified tress can be desighed to resist certain kind of threat such as pests, but the natural plants are more genetically diverse. So even some of the natural individuals dies because some reasons such as climate change or pest, others that are able to resist those threatening factors can survive and keep the whole species safe. But the genetically modified tress are genetically uniformed. Once those genetically modified meet some unpredictable dangers, they will all be wiped out.
Moreover, compared with the natural seeds, famers need to cost more money on planting genetically modified trees. Because the company that sells the genetically modified species will charge the farmers and not allow them to keep the seeds after harvest in order to protect their property. Therefore, genetically modified trees will not necessarily bring economic benefits to the farmers that grow them.
Last but not the least, the genetically modified trees usuallly grow more agressively so they can outcompete with the native species. The genetically motified species will threat the natural ones by competeing for the rescouces such as sunlight and nutrients. In this way, the native and natural species will be in trouble.
Based on the aforementioned analysis, the professor doesn't agree with the benefits in the reading passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...s are more genetically diverse. So even some of the natural individuals dies because some r...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ly diverse. So even some of the natural individuals dies because some reasons such as clima...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 53, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... aforementioned analysis, the professor doesnt agree with the benefits in the reading ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, even so, kind of, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38524590164 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70174926165 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4520808861 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421147497159 0.272083759551 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172422778367 0.0996497079465 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939794368582 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214051731602 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116389328353 0.0443174109184 263% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.