The article states that the ethanol is a good alternative for gasoline and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that the three reasons are not convincing, the merits of using the ethanol, and he refutes the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that using of ethanol is not the good way to solve the most global environmental problem such as the global warming since it emits carbon dioxide into the atmosphere that leads trap the heat in the atmosphere. The professor refutes this point, he states that increase the use of ethanol will not add to the global warming. It is true that it emits carbon dioxide, ethanol produced from the plants as corn, so, the growing process of the plants will counteract the carbon dioxide emitted since it absorbs the carbon dioxide through the growing process.
Second, the article claims the production of a high amount of ethanol will decrease the amount of plants such as corn which is used to feed many animals such as chicken at the same time is used for produce ethanol that leads to decrease the amount of food source for animals. However, the professor says that large-scale production of ethanol will not reduce the amount of food source for animals since the ethanol can be produced from cellulose which is the cell of the plant part that not be eaten by animals, therefore, the amount of animal food will not decrease.
The third, the reading claims that there is no difference in the prices of gasoline and ethanol because of the help of the government to the ethanol producer. The professor says that this claim is problematic; he explains that there is competition between the prices of the ethanol and gasoline. If the people start buying the ethanol, the price of ethanol will decrease to 40 percent, and also the government supports the ethanol producer to make the price of ethanol cheaper.
Essay evaluation report
the three reasons are not convincing, the merits of using the ethanol,
the three reasons are not convincing the merits of using the ethanol,
he states that increase the use of ethanol will not add to the global warming
he states that increasing the use of ethanol will not add to the global warming
he states that the increased use of ethanol will not add to the global warming
which is the cell of the plant part that not be eaten by animals
which is the cell of the plant part that can not be eaten by animals
flaws:
No. of Words: 322 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 12
No. of Words: 322 250
No. of Characters: 1531 1200
No. of Different Words: 126 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.236 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.755 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.34 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 119 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 89 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 32.2 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.574 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.7 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.453 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.724 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.242 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article states that the ethanol is a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and he refutes the authors reasons. First, the reading states that using of ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dioxide through the growing process. Second, the article claims the productio...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt of animal food will not decrease. The third, the reading claims that there...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'such as', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.278735632184 0.261695866417 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.152298850575 0.158904122519 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0574712643678 0.0723426182421 79% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0344827586207 0.0435111971325 79% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0201149425287 0.0277247811725 73% => OK
Prepositions: 0.146551724138 0.128828473217 114% => OK
Participles: 0.0287356321839 0.0370669169778 78% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.42844434228 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0201149425287 0.0208969081088 96% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.155172413793 0.128158765124 121% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0201149425287 0.0158828679856 127% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0114942528736 0.0114777025283 100% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1908.0 1645.83664459 116% => OK
No of words: 322.0 271.125827815 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92546583851 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.378881987578 0.374372842146 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.27950310559 0.287516216867 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.152173913043 0.187439937562 81% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0714285714286 0.113142543107 63% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42844434228 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.422360248447 0.539623497131 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 41.5088025094 53.8517498576 77% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 32.2 21.7502111507 148% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3622481955 49.3711431718 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 190.8 132.220823453 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2 21.7502111507 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 60.150310559 50.5018328374 119% => OK
Elegance: 2.19444444444 1.90840788429 115% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.759877192534 0.549887131256 138% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.29646560482 0.142949733639 207% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.100844645537 0.0787303798458 128% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.832731513435 0.631733273073 132% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0730155688677 0.139662658121 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.518097804946 0.266732575781 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754091051399 0.103435571967 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.545648540082 0.414875509568 132% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0265720480953 0.0530846634433 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.611815681084 0.40443939384 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504814248133 0.0528353158467 96% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.