In terms of whether ethanol fuel considers a good alternative to gasoline, the reading and the listening are contradictory to each other. The reading provides three critics where made ethanol fuel not plausible to use, however, the professor argues against them and states that none of them is convincing.
First, the passage mentions that ethanol fuel is like gasoline in a term of producing greenhouse gas; thus, ethanol won't solve the problem of global warming. The professor contends this point by stating that ethanol fuel will not add global warming because of its process of growing plants and the benefits of observing carbon dioxide by plants, which it will remove greenhouse gases by the atmosphere.
Second, the reading claims that ethanol production consumes a significant amount of plants, which will limit its availability and its usage on feeding animals. The lecturer refutes this point by saying that ethanol production does not reduce other sources because of only part of plants that can be used to produce ethanol fuel. This part of the plant located on the wall and called cellulose and animals do not eat the plant walls; thus there is no negative impact on animals feeding.
Finally, contrary to the belief in the reading that the cost of ethanol gas is more than the cost of gasoline, the professor argues against this point by stating that in the future, when people start to use ethanol fuel the price will drop. He explains that increase production of ethanol will help to decrease its price as it becomes a demand of people. He mentions a study that shows when production of ethanol raises three times the cost will decrease by 40%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97142857143 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44822926431 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.4874694596 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.2 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 21.698381199 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434319746155 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187674079265 0.0996497079465 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835829331342 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27618219022 0.162205337803 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285694494134 0.0443174109184 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.